Takze muj test hAP ax s FS 7.20.6:
Trasa a zapojeni: Internet - RB5009 - switch - hAP ax s - hAP ax2
Test mezi RB5009 a hAPax2, hAP ax 2 jen jako mezikus.
WAN - eth1
LAN - bridge eth2-5
snat: 670/790 cpu hAP ax s: 80%
snat+fasttrack: 920/930 cpu hAP ax s: 63%
masquarade: 870/750 cpu hAP ax s: 80%
masquarade+fasttrack: 900/900 cpu hAP ax s: 50%
bridge eth1-5
RB5009-eth1, hAP ax2 eth4: 910/930 cpu hAP ax s: 50%
RB5009-eth2, hAP ax2 eth4: 914/935 cpu hAP ax s: 1%
V ceste je jeste switch, s tiskarnou a mym PC. Statistika ovlivnena 1G portem do switche.
WiFi test
20MHz 220/190
40MHz 430/340
80MHz 520*300 (link rate 1200/1200)
ax2 80MHz (stejny kanal) 570/407
iperf PC (napojen na switch) 5 connection
500/320
test pres ax2 (domaci)
790/500
Zaver. Na domacnost zaklad v pohode. Za me asi lepsi jak ac2.
- + Je to ax, vyssi rychlost oproti ac2
- + Mela by byt citlivejsi (muze byt zkresleno diky 3 chains)
- + Ma vyssi zisk anteny na 5GHz (muze byt zkresleno diky 3 chains)
- + PoE out na portu 5 (jiny nez PoE in)
- + Levnejsi cca o 500,-
- + Kabel dokaze porad v klidu 1G i kdyz to jde pres CPU
- - Vetsi
- - Drzak
- - Jede pomaleji nez ax2
Srovnani anten:
hAP ac2
2 chains Antenna gain dBi for 2.4 GHz 2.5
2 chains Antenna gain dBi for 5 GHz 2.5 AC1200 MCS9 - 19/-70
hAP ax s
2 chains Antenna gain dBi for 2.4 GHz 5.5
3 chains Antenna gain dBi for 5 GHz 8.07 AX2400 MCS11 - 18/-69 (MCS9 - 20/-72)
hAP ax2
2 chains Antenna gain dBi for 2.4 GHz 4
2 chains Antenna gain dBi for 5 GHz 4,5 AX1800 MCS11 - 18/-67 (MCS9 - 20/-70)
Test SFP jsem nedelal.
Dole dotaz na spotrebu, tak jsem to hodil pres merak a zkusil
Pri startu cca 2.5W, pri dostartovani (zapojen 1 kabel) 4W.
Pri testu jednoho telefonu na 5G a mereni rychlost.cz to dalo 5-6.5W.
iTomB
